CommunityBrowse groupsBlogEtiquetteInvite Your friendsSuccess Stories


Calories in flour - is this right?

I feel like a retard, but this seems nuts. I'm trying to figure out calories in a recipie, and it calls for 1 cup of flour. The package says 2 tbsp = 100 calories. So here's my calculations:

2 tbsp = 100 cal
16 tbsp in a cup
so....800 calories in 1 cup of flour?

By similar reasoning, there's 1120 calories in 1/3 of a cup of margarine.

These numbers seem huge - I can maybe see the margarine, since it's all fat, but the flour seems crazy. In comparison, 1 cup of quick cooking oats is only 300 calories.

So, am I doing this correctly? Will I ever bake again? I doubt it if these number are right!

Fri. Sep 7, 12:29pm

Add comment  
A cup of flour weighs less than a cup of water - about half. Your calculations are generally correct for most things but don't take into account that whole mass/volume thing that I haven't studied in 20 years. Anyway, your cup of flour is most likely 400-450 cals.

Friday, September 07, 2007, 12:42 PM

Add comment
Hmmm, the flour I have here at home (all purpose flour) is 62 cals per tablespoon. Which makes it 455 calories per cup. You must have some HEARTY flour on hand!

I'm not sure I get your "reasoning" about margarine. Most margarines and butters are roughly 100 calories per tablespoon. 1/3 of a cup is 2.6 oz or 5.3 tablespoons which is 530 calories. There is nothing wrong with baking-just don't eat the entire thing of whatever you are making!

Friday, September 07, 2007, 12:52 PM

Add comment
12:52 - she says 2 tbsp = 100 calories. So 2 tbsp of your flour is 124 calories.

Friday, September 07, 2007, 1:54 PM

Add comment
This is the OP - I misread my margarine container - I figure about 560 calories per 1/3 cup...sorry!

Friday, September 07, 2007, 1:57 PM

Add comment
measure by weight, not volume

1 cup of flour is about 4 3/8 ounces

Average flour has about 100 calories per ounce, so 1 cup is about 440 calories.

Friday, September 07, 2007, 4:09 PM

Add comment
This is the OP - so should I always figure out calories by weight and not by volume? I've generally been doing it by volume because it's so much easier, but I'm starting to see that this may not be the best way to go....

Friday, September 07, 2007, 5:19 PM

Add comment

Related Content:

How To Lose Weight- The Basics
Weight Watchers Points System
The Fat Smash Diet
The Eat To Live Diet
The Beck Diet Solution
How To Get The Motivation To Lose Weight


How To Be Successful Using PEERtrainer

How To Burn Fat
Online Weight Loss Support- How It Works
Does Green Tea Help You Lose Weight?
Tips On Using PEERtrainer
Visit The PEERtrainer Community
Diet and Fitness Resources


Weight Watchers Meetings
Learning To Inspire Others: You Already Are
Writing Down Your Daily Workouts
Spending Money On A Personal Trainer?
How I Became A Marathon Runner


Preventive Health

How To Prevent Injuries During Your Workout
Flu Season: Should You Take The Flu Shot?
Are You Really Ready To Start PEERtrainer?
Super Foods That Can Boost Your Energy
Reversing Disease Through Nutrition

New Diet and Fitness Articles:

Weight Watchers Points Plus
How To Adjust Your Body To Exercise
New: Weight Watchers Momentum Program
New: PEERtrainer Blog Archive
Review Of The New Weight Watchers Momentum Program

Weight Loss Motivation by Joshua Wayne:

Why Simple Goal Setting Is Not Enough
How To Delay Short Term Gratification
How To Stay Motivated
How To Exercise With A Busy Schedule

Real World Nutrition and Fitness Questions

Can Weight Lifting Help You Lose Weight?
Are Protein Drinks Safe?
Nutrition As Medicine?

Everyday Weight Loss Tips

How To Eat Healthy At A Party
How To Eat Out And Still Lose Weight
The Three Bite Rule
Tips On How To Stop A Binge